Carbon dating falacy is juanita bynum dating stacey woods
Does radiometric dating provide the desperately needed 'proof' that evolutionists have long been searching for? In order to correctly understand the issue, you must come to an understanding of the process or mechanics behind the idea of radiometric dating.There are several methods used, but in this small article, only two will be examined: - The Uranium-Thorium-Lead method - And the Potassium-Argon method Each of these methods rely upon the common fact that the parent component in a system (e.g., uranium) will gradually 'decay' into the daughter component (e.g., lead).The carbon absorbed is both C-12 and C-14 and it is absorbed at the same ratio as it exists in the atmosphere.Once a living thing dies, it stops absorbing both C-12 and C-14.You will explore such things as, the Evidence of Space, the Evidence of Earth, the Evidence of Logic, the Fallacy of Carbon Dating and all other evolutionary dating methods, the Circular Reasoning of the Geologic Column and finally the Rapid Formation of Rocks, Caves, Stalagmites and Stalactites, and even Fossils.
Therefore, A Young Earth exposes the falsehood of evolutionary dating methods and reveals beyond a shadow of a doubt that we really do have A Young Earth just like the Bible states.The process is unhindered in development, it is separate from outside factors. If it were changed, then any calculation of the earth's age or the sample's age would be incorrect. The idea that a system in nature could remain closed (that is, not influenced by any outside sources) for millions or billions of years is absurd to the highest degree. Is it possible to know the original components of a system formed billions of years ago?b.) Not have any of the daughter components present in the initial system. If there existed any of the daughter components in the original system, you would have to know that amount and incorporate it into your calculations. To obtain a proper date, you would need to compensate for the fluctuating process rate. Is there such a thing in nature as a closed system? According to evolutionists, there were no humans around during that time, so the notion that we can know the original components is once again absurd. What process rate in an open system remains unchanged?Notice that something must have been alive to absorb C-12 and C-14.
Therefore it is not possible to date inorganic material.The older an organism's remains are, the less beta radiation it emits because its C-14 is steadily dwindling at a predictable rate.